While agricultural produce market committees (APMC) marketsālocally termed mandisāhave protected farmers from gross exploitation since their widespread adoption in the 1960s and ā70s, governmental and academic studies have regularly highlighted systemic issues that plague these regulatory bodies. These include the disproportionate influence of traders and intermediaries over prices, often as a result of monopsony (a market with only one major buyer); cartelization; conflicts of interest; rent-seeking; and limited price discovery mechanisms. Many mandis also lack storage and other infrastructure, which leads to waste and depressed prices for farmers.
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.
Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style