How did the debate over state sovereignty in the Nullification Crisis reappear during Southern secession in 1860–61?
The debate over state sovereignty during the Nullification Crisis of 1832–33 centered on the theory that the U.S. Constitution was a compact among sovereign states, granting them the right to judge federal acts and nullify those they deemed unconstitutional. Proponents, led by John C. Calhoun, argued that this "interposition" protected minority interests from federal overreach.123
This constitutional argument resurfaced in 1860–61 as the primary justification for secession. While the Nullification Crisis was ostensibly about tariffs, it was deeply rooted in Southern fears regarding the future of slavery. By 1860, the election of Abraham Lincoln convinced Southern leaders that their constitutional rights and social institutions were under direct threat.1245
Building on the earlier compact theory, 11 Southern states asserted that their sovereignty allowed them to withdraw from the Union entirely. Unlike the 1830s, when South Carolina stood alone, the 1860 crisis escalated into the American Civil War, ultimately resolving the question of whether states possessed the right to unilaterally dissolve their ties to the federal government.1453