How did Little Boy differ from Fat Man?

Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.

Little Boy and Fat Man differed primarily in their design, fissile material, and explosive yield.

  • Design and Mechanism: Little Boy utilized a "gun-assembly" design, in which an explosive propellant fired one subcritical mass of uranium-235 into another to create a critical mass. In contrast, Fat Man used an "implosion" design, where a spherical core of plutonium-239 was compressed by high explosives to reach a supercritical state.123
  • Fissile Material: Little Boy relied on highly enriched uranium, while Fat Man used plutonium. Plutonium was unsuitable for the gun-assembly method because its faster fission rate risked premature detonation.143
  • Explosive Yield: Fat Man was significantly more powerful, with an estimated yield of 21,000 tons of TNT, compared to the approximately 15,000-ton yield of Little Boy.124

While Little Boy was used untested on Hiroshima, the Fat Man design was complex enough to require a successful full-scale test, known as the Trinity test, before its deployment over Nagasaki.124