Why do some scholars consider the category Abrahamic religions a modern idea that can hide important differences among religions?

Some scholars argue that the category of Abrahamic religions is a modern, artificial construct rather than a reflection of an inherent historical phenomenon. Critics contend that grouping Judaism, Christianity, and Islam under this single umbrella can obscure their complex historical interactions and significant doctrinal differences.12

By treating these traditions as a singular, immutable family, the classification may erroneously suggest they are transhistorical entities. Furthermore, scholars note that this framing creates an implicit, potentially distorting opposition between these faiths and non-Abrahamic traditions, such as Hinduism or Buddhism, which can alienate the latter from interfaith discourse.1

While the term is often employed in political and ecumenical contexts to foster fraternity and counter prejudice, critics like Aaron Hughes argue that it functions more as a form of "wish fulfillment" or a modern projection onto the historical record. Despite these concerns, some scholars maintain that the category remains a useful tool for comparative study, provided it is used to analyze cultural interactions rather than to erase distinct identities.123