- Also spelled:
- Volodymyr Zelenskyy
- Born:
- January 25, 1978, Kryvyy Rih, Ukraine, U.S.S.R. [now in Ukraine] (age 48)
- Title / Office:
- president (2019-), Ukraine
- Political Affiliation:
- Servant of the People
Volodymyr Zelensky
Who is Volodymyr Zelensky?
What was Volodymyr Zelensky’s career before politics?
How did Volodymyr Zelensky become president of Ukraine?
What role did Volodymyr Zelensky play in the Russia-Ukraine War?
What was the controversy involving Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump?
News •
Volodymyr Zelensky (born January 25, 1978, Kryvyy Rih, Ukraine, U.S.S.R. [now in Ukraine]) is a Ukrainian actor and comedian who was elected president of Ukraine in 2019. Although he was a political novice, Zelensky’s anti-corruption platform won him widespread support, and his significant online following translated into a solid electoral base. He won a landslide victory over incumbent Petro Poroshenko in the second round of the 2019 presidential election. Zelensky’s leadership during the Russia-Ukraine War won him global acclaim.
Early life, family, and career as an entertainer
Zelensky was born to Jewish parents in the industrial metropolis of Kryvyy Rih in southern Ukraine. When he was a small child, his family relocated to Erdenet, Mongolia, for four years before returning to Kryvyy Rih, where Zelensky entered school. Like many people from Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk region, he grew up as a native Russian speaker, but he also acquired fluency in both Ukrainian and English. In 1995 he entered Kryvyy Rih Economic Institute, the local campus of Kyiv National Economic University, and in 2000 he graduated with a law degree.
Although Zelensky was licensed to practice law, his career was already headed in a different direction. While still a student, he had become active in theater, and this would become his primary focus. In 1997 his performance group, Kvartal 95 (“Quarter 95,” the neighborhood in central Kryvyy Rih where Zelensky spent his childhood), appeared in the televised finals of KVN (Klub vesyólykh i nakhódchivykh; “Club of the Funny and Inventive People”), a popular improvisational comedy competition that was broadcast throughout the Commonwealth of Independent States. Zelensky and Kvartal 95 became regulars on KVN, and they appeared on the program until 2003.
On September 6, 2003, Zelensky and Olena Kiyashko were married. The pair had dated throughout college, and Kiyashko was a writer in Zelensky’s comedy troupe. Kiyashko studied civil engineering and had earned a degree in architecture, but, like Zelensky, she opted to pursue a career in entertainment. She was a scriptwriter on a number of high-profile projects for Studio Kvartal 95, including Servant of the People. The Zelenskys have two children: a daughter, Oleksandra (born 2004), and a son, Kyrylo (born 2013).
In 2003 Zelensky cofounded Studio Kvartal 95, a production company that would become one of Ukraine’s most successful and prolific entertainment studios. Zelensky would serve as artistic director of Studio Kvartal 95 from the company’s creation until 2011, when he was named general producer of the Ukrainian television channel Inter TV.
Zelensky left Inter TV in 2012, and in October of that year he and Kvartal 95 concluded a joint production agreement with the Ukrainian network 1+1. That network was owned by Ihor Kolomoisky, one of the wealthiest people in Ukraine, and the relationship between Zelensky and Kolomoisky would become the subject of scrutiny when Zelensky declared his intention to enter politics. In addition to working in television during this period, Zelensky appeared in a number of feature films, including the historical farce Rzhevskiy Versus Napoleon (2012) and the romantic comedies 8 First Dates (2012) and 8 New Dates (2015).
Servant of the People and path to the presidency
In 2013 Zelensky returned to Kvartal 95 as artistic director, but his entertainment career would soon intersect with the seismic events rocking Ukraine’s political landscape. In February 2014 the government of Ukrainian Pres. Viktor Yanukovych was toppled after months of popular protests, and that May billionaire Petro Poroshenko was elected president of Ukraine. With a Russian-backed insurgency raging in eastern Ukraine and endemic corruption undermining public confidence in government, Poroshenko struggled to enact even modest reforms. It was against this backdrop that Servant of the People premiered on 1+1 in October 2015. Zelensky was cast as Vasiliy Goloborodko, an everyman history teacher who becomes a viral Internet phenomenon after a student films him delivering an impassioned and profanity-laden address against official corruption. The show was a massive hit, and Goloborodko’s unlikely path to the presidency of Ukraine would provide something of a road map for Zelensky. In anticipation of that move, in 2018 Kvartal 95 officially registered Servant of the People as a political party in Ukraine.
With the Ukrainian economy stalled and Poroshenko’s approval rating approaching single digits, it seemed likely that the 2019 presidential election would be a repeat of the 2014 contest, with the incumbent facing Orange Revolution veteran Yulia Tymoshenko. Instead, more than three dozen candidates entered the race, and Zelensky emerged as one of the front-runners virtually from the moment of the declaration of his candidacy. That announcement was made on 1+1 on December 31, 2018, preempting Poroshenko’s annual New Year’s address. The provocative move raised questions about the involvement of 1+1 owner Kolomoisky in Zelensky’s campaign. Kolomoisky, formerly a staunch Poroshenko ally, had been living in self-imposed exile since June 2017, after Poroshenko nationalized PrivatBank, a financial institution that Kolomoisky had cofounded. Kolomoisky was accused of stealing billions from PrivatBank, Ukraine’s largest lender, and the Ukrainian government was forced to inject more than $5.6 billion into the “too big to fail” company to keep it afloat.
Zelensky took steps to distance himself from Kolomoisky, a task that was simplified by his unorthodox campaign strategy. He eschewed detailed policy statements and press conferences in favor of short speeches or comedy routines posted to YouTube and Instagram. On March 31, 2019, Zelensky won over 30 percent of the vote in the first round of the presidential election, and Poroshenko finished a distant second with 16 percent. Zelensky declined to debate Poroshenko until two days before the second round of polling would begin, and that meeting had all the trappings of a sporting event. On April 19, 2019, tens of thousands gathered at Kyiv’s Olympic Stadium to witness the confrontation, and, although Poroshenko attempted to portray Zelensky as a political novice who lacked the fortitude to confront Russian Pres. Vladimir Putin, he failed to land any significant blows against his opponent. A second debate was scheduled for later in the evening, but Zelensky did not attend, stating that there “had been enough debates for one day.”
Presidency of Ukraine
On April 21 Zelensky was elected president of Ukraine with an impressive 73 percent of the vote. Within days the president-elect faced his first foreign policy challenge, when Putin announced his decision to offer Russian passports to the Ukrainian citizens in separatist-controlled areas of war-torn eastern Ukraine. The Russian-backed hybrid war there was entering its fifth year, and hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians had been displaced by the conflict. Zelensky ridiculed the offer, responding with a Facebook post that extended Ukrainian citizenship to Russians and others “who suffer from authoritarian or corrupt regimes.”
Early challenges and snap election
On May 20, 2019, Zelensky was sworn in as president. He used his inaugural address, which he delivered in a mix of Russian and Ukrainian, to call for national unity and to announce the dissolution of the Verkhovna Rada (Supreme Council). This move was politically necessary: His presidential victory did not confer a legislative mandate, as Servant of the People did not occupy any parliamentary seats. Snap elections were held on July 21, and Zelensky himself characterized the contest as “maybe more important than the presidential election.” Servant of the People won an absolute majority, capturing 254 of 450 seats (26 seats, representing Crimea—a Ukrainian autonomous republic that was illegally annexed by Russia in 2014—and the war zone in the east, were not contested). The result marked the first time in Ukraine’s post-Soviet history that a single party could command absolute control over the legislative agenda.
While Zelensky worked to build his new administration, ties to his former business partner again became the subject of scrutiny. Kolomoisky’s media empire had provided a valuable platform for Zelensky during the presidential campaign, but Zelensky vowed that no special favors would be granted by his office. Kolomoisky himself had returned to Ukraine just days before Zelensky’s inauguration; the billionaire stated that he would not act as a “grey cardinal,” directing policy from behind the scenes.
Zelensky and U.S. Pres. Donald Trump
In September 2019 Zelensky found his administration thrust into the center of a political scandal in the United States when a whistleblower in the American intelligence community lodged a formal complaint about the actions of U.S. Pres. Donald Trump. The matter concerned Trump’s alleged withholding of a significant military aid package to Ukraine unless Ukraine initiated an investigation of alleged wrongdoing by former U.S. vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Hunter Biden had served on the board of Ukrainian energy conglomerate Burisma Holdings, and Trump claimed, without evidence, that the elder Biden had used his office to benefit his son.
In April 2019 Biden had announced that he would seek the Democratic presidential nomination to challenge Trump in 2020, and Biden quickly became the party’s front-runner. Contacts between Trump’s personal lawyer, former New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani, and Yuriy Lutsenko, Ukraine’s prosecutor general, began in earnest soon afterward, and they predated Zelensky’s inauguration. These discussions initially focused on claims involving the 2016 U.S. presidential election and former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, but they soon expanded to include Biden. Zelensky’s transition team declined a request to meet with Giuliani over what they saw as a matter of internal U.S. politics, but Trump continued to pursue the allegations. In a phone call with Zelensky on July 25, 2019, Trump discussed an investigation of the Biden family. Although Trump admitted that he had ordered the aid package withheld in anticipation of that call, he claimed that no quid pro quo was offered or demanded.
Zelensky stated that he would look into the Burisma matter, and he sacked Lutsenko in August. At that time nearly $400 million in U.S. military aid remained in limbo, despite its bipartisan authorization by the U.S. Congress. Those funds were finally released on September 11, 2019, but, by that point, American lawmakers had begun to push for more information regarding Trump and the details of his July 25 call with Zelensky. That call and Trump’s alleged attempt to pressure Zelensky served as the basis for a U.S. House of Representatives impeachment inquiry that was opened on September 24, 2019. Trump was convicted by the House but ultimately acquitted by the Senate, and he responded by purging those officials whom he considered disloyal. This meant the departure of some of the most experienced Russia and Ukraine experts from the U.S. national security staff.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine
As was the case in many countries around the world, daily life in Ukraine was profoundly affected by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Zelensky crafted a national mitigation strategy that was designed to limit the spread of COVID-19, the potentially deadly disease caused by the virus, but some local politicians resisted direction from Kyiv. Mayors of several of Ukraine’s largest cities, feeling empowered by the 2014 government reforms that had devolved significant autonomy to the local level, clashed with Zelensky over proposed business closures and lockdown measures. The tug-of-war between Zelensky and the mayors would have a significant effect on local elections in October 2020. Regional parties dominated mayoral races while national parties, including Zelensky’s Servant of the People, struggled. The poor electoral performance also reflected an overall decline in Zelensky’s public approval. The populist reform platform that had swept him into office appeared to be stalled, and the conflict in eastern Ukraine remained unsettled. While Zelensky did manage to jump-start his political agenda with the passage of a law intended to curb the influence of oligarchs, the Russian-backed insurgency in the Donbas soon devolved into the largest threat to European stability since World War II.
In late 2021 Russia began a massive buildup of troops and matériel along its border with Ukraine. Additional Russian forces were sent to Belarus—ostensibly for joint exercises with that country’s military—and a sizable Russian naval flotilla was assembled in the Black Sea. Western intelligence agencies stated that the moves were a clear precursor to an invasion, but Putin denied any such intent. Western leaders carried on negotiations with both Putin and Zelensky in an effort to prevent the bloodshed that appeared inevitable, but Russia’s military preparations continued. On February 21, 2022, Putin announced that he would recognize the independence of the self-proclaimed people’s republics of Donetsk and Luhansk and dispatch “peacekeepers” to both regions. Western leaders responded by leveling a new round of sanctions, and, in the early morning hours of February 24, Zelensky delivered a televised plea for peace directly to the Russian people. Shortly thereafter, at about 6:00 am Moscow time, Putin announced the beginning of a “special military operation,” and Russian cruise missiles began to rain down on targets in Ukraine. The Russian invasion of Ukraine drew condemnation from leaders around the world. Russian troops and armored vehicles poured into Ukraine from Russia, Russian-occupied Crimea, and Belarus, and scores of military personnel and civilians were killed in the first day of fighting. As world leaders announced increasingly tough sanctions against Russia, Zelensky tried to rally support from abroad, warning that a “new Iron Curtain” was descending on Europe.
Zelensky became the face of Ukrainian resistance, and his entertainment background and media savvy provided Ukraine with a weapon for which Putin had no counter. In the information war, the winner was unquestionably Zelensky. After Russian propaganda organs attempted to promote the false claim that Zelensky had fled the capital, he took to the street and filmed himself defiantly standing in central Kyiv. When the United States offered to evacuate him from the combat zone, Zelensky reportedly said, “The fight is here. I need ammunition, not a ride.” Often clad in an olive drab T-shirt, he delivered video addresses to governments around the world, calling upon them to provide Ukraine with military aid and to limit Russia’s ability to wage an offensive war through whatever means possible. Zelensky’s efforts were largely successful; although NATO balked at enforcing a no-fly zone over Ukraine (such an act would have been tantamount to a declaration of war against Russia), Western countries flooded Ukraine with antitank weapons and surface-to-air missile systems. In addition, the sanctions regime that was leveled against Russia was among the most severe in history, and the Russian economy reeled as a result.
After the initial Russian offensive against Kyiv collapsed, Russian forces withdrew from the area and left scenes of carnage in their wake. In April Zelensky traveled to the liberated Kyiv suburb of Bucha, where Russian occupiers had massacred hundreds of civilians in a spasm of violence that the United Nations later characterized as a war crime. Throughout the spring and summer of 2022 Zelensky greeted a succession of Western leaders in Kyiv, European Commission Pres. Ursula von der Leyen making multiple trips. During one such visit von der Leyen personally delivered the documents that formalized Ukraine’s intent to join the European Union; Ukraine was granted EU candidate status on June 23.
Zelensky’s appeal for increased defense aid bore fruit when the United States dispatched High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) to Ukraine. HIMARS gave the Ukrainian military the ability to strike targets far behind the front lines with great precision, and the artillery system would be a critical element in Ukraine’s long-anticipated counteroffensive. Between August and November 2022 Ukrainian forces liberated a vast swath of territory, recapturing virtually all of the Kharkiv region and forcing the Russians out of Kherson. Zelensky regularly traveled to the combat zone, greeting residents of newly freed villages or bolstering the morale of troops in front line cities like Bakhmut. In December 2022 Zelensky was named Time’s Person of the Year in a decision that the magazine’s editor claimed was “the most clear-cut in memory.” Later that month Zelensky made his first foreign trip since the Russian invasion when he traveled to Washington, D.C., to address a joint session of the U.S. Congress.
As 2023 dawned, Russia continued to attack Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure while it mounted sanguinary assaults on Ukrainian positions in the Donbas. Zelensky shook up his cabinet by dismissing a raft of senior officials who were implicated in a financial scandal involving the procurement of wartime supplies. Tackling government corruption was a key condition for EU membership, and among those included in the broadening investigation was Kolomoisky, the oligarch who had played a key role in Zelensky’s rise to prominence. In February 2023 Zelensky made another trip abroad, with stops in London, Paris (where he was awarded the Legion of Honour by French Pres. Emmanuel Macron), and Brussels. In Brussels he told assembled EU leaders that, by continuing to support Ukraine, “We are all protecting Europe” from Russian aggression.
On February 20, 2023, just days ahead of the war’s first anniversary, U.S. Pres. Joe Biden made a surprise visit to Kyiv, where he met with Zelensky and pledged additional security assistance to Ukraine. In May Ukrainian troops withdrew from the shattered city of Bakhmut; months of human wave attacks had finally overwhelmed the defenders, but the cost to the Russians had been astonishing. At least 100,000 Russians were killed or wounded in a 10-month assault on a city that had minimal strategic value.
The war took an unexpected turn in June 2023 when Yevgeny Prigozhin—whose Kremlin-backed Wagner Group mercenaries had borne the brunt of the fighting at Bakhmut—launched a short-lived uprising against the Russian defense ministry. Prigozhin occupied Russia’s Southern Military District headquarters in Rostov-on-Don, while Wagner operations chief Dmitry Utkin led an armored column of some 25,000 Wagner mercenaries toward Moscow. Although the Wagner force encountered minimal effective resistance, Prigozhin halted the advance just 120 miles (roughly 200 km) from Moscow and ordered the troops back to their positions in Ukraine. Belarusian Pres. Alexander Lukashenko brokered a deal between Prigozhin and the Kremlin, but few were surprised when, two months later, a private plane carrying Utkin and Prigozhin crashed under mysterious circumstances. Zelensky stated that the entire situation had revealed Putin’s relative weakness, and in an address to the United Nations, he said, “Evil cannot be trusted. Ask Prigozhin.”
In December 2023, almost exactly 10 years after the start of the Maidan protest movement that brought down the Yanukovych government, the EU officially opened accession talks with Ukraine. The event was celebrated in Brussels and Kyiv, and Zelensky hailed the news as “a victory for all of Europe.”
Dismissal of Zaluzhny and delayed presidential election
On February 8, 2024, Zelensky dismissed Gen. Valery Zaluzhny, Ukraine’s top military commander, as part of a “reboot” of the war effort. Zaluzhny remained immensely popular within the military and the Ukrainian public, but disagreements between the two men over the direction of the war had become fodder for headlines in the Ukrainian press. The dismissal had the potential to split Ukraine’s political and military elite into opposing camps, but Zelensky and Zaluzhny acted quickly to present the move as an amicable one, and the two were pictured smiling and shaking hands in Zelensky’s office. For his part, Zaluzhny dismissed any talk of mounting a political challenge to Zelensky while the war was ongoing. In March Zaluzhny was named ambassador to the United Kingdom. It was undoubtedly a high-profile posting with a vital strategic ally, but the appointment also removed Zaluzhny from Kyiv at a time when his public approval numbers rivaled or even eclipsed those of Zelensky.
Zaluzhny’s replacement was Gen. Oleksandr Syrsky, ground commander of the defense of Kyiv in the early days of the war and architect of the wildly successful Kharkiv counteroffensive in summer 2022. Syrsky also oversaw the defense of Bakhmut, and a little over a week after his appointment, Syrsky ordered the withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Avdiivka. Russia’s Pyrrhic victory in that Donbas city proved to be nearly as costly as its earlier capture of Bakhmut, and minor gains achieved at the cost of enormous losses came to characterize the Russian war effort.
Presidential elections were scheduled to be held in spring 2024, and Zelensky’s five-year term was due to expire in May of that year. Ukrainian law barred the holding of elections while martial law was in effect, however, and an overwhelming majority of Ukrainians supported the extension of Zelensky’s term until the end of the war. Even Poroshenko and Tymoshenko, arguably the most prominent likely candidates for the presidency, publicly declared that such a challenge should only be mounted once martial law had ended.
In September 2024 Zelensky carried out the first major reshuffle of his cabinet since the beginning of the war. Andrii Sybiha, who had served as ambassador to Turkey before becoming an adviser to Zelensky, was elevated to foreign minister. Olga Stefanishyna was tapped to head a joint office as deputy prime minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration (a portfolio that oversaw Ukraine’s efforts toward membership in the European Union and NATO) as well as justice minister. Oleksiy Kuleba, who had worked in the president’s office, was appointed deputy prime minister for reconstruction.
Clash with Trump and the “Cardboard Revolution”
During the 2024 U.S. presidential campaign, Trump had boasted dozens of times that, if elected, he would end the Russia-Ukraine War “before I even arrive at the Oval Office.” That did not happen, and shortly after his return to the White House, Trump took to social media in an effort to pressure Ukraine to end the war on his terms. Trump stated—falsely—that Ukraine had started the war, and he accused Zelensky of being a “Dictator without Elections” who held a “4 percent approval rating.” All of the claims reflected Kremlin talking points, which Zelensky addressed, saying that Trump “unfortunately lives in this disinformation space.”
Zelensky’s White House meeting
On February 28, 2025, Zelensky traveled to Washington, D.C., for an Oval Office meeting. The event seemed cordial, until a reporter with a MAGA-aligned news outlet began disparaging Zelensky’s attire—a military-style collarless shirt and black pants, an outfit typical of Zelensky’s public appearances since the beginning of the war. “Why don’t you wear a suit?” the reporter asked, adding, “A lot of Americans have problems with you respecting this office.”
Zelensky tried to deflect the comment with a sarcastic remark, but the mood in the room abruptly changed. What followed was nothing less than a televised three-way argument between Zelensky, Trump, and Vice Pres. JD Vance, with both Trump and Vance insisting that Zelensky had never said “thank you” for American support, despite the fact that Zelensky had expressed his thanks several times in the space of just a few minutes. Trump repeatedly told Zelensky “you don’t have the cards” and that Ukraine is in “big trouble,” before closing the meeting with, “This is going to be great television. I will say that.” It seemed like the relationship between the U.S. and Ukraine was on the verge of breakdown. Within a week, Trump had suspended all military aid and intelligence sharing with Kyiv, and when Trump proposed a 30-day ceasefire in March, Zelensky accepted. Putin, however, refused, as he was eager to exploit the pause in U.S. support on the battlefield. By April, Russian and North Korean troops had driven Ukrainian forces from Kursk, ending Ukraine’s eight-month occupation of Russian territory and depriving Zelensky of a significant bargaining chip in any future negotiations with Russia.
Shmyhal’s resignation and anti-corruption protests
July 2025 was perhaps the most eventful month in domestic Ukrainian politics since the beginning of the war. On July 15 Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal submitted his resignation as part of a larger cabinet reshuffle. Shmyhal had held that position since March 2020, and his five-year term made him the longest-serving prime minister in Ukrainian history. Shmyhal was named defense minister, and he was succeeded as prime minister by Yulia Svyrydenko.
The following week, Zelensky signed a law that curbed the independence of Ukraine’s most prominent anti-corruption bodies, placing them under the authority of the prosecutor general (a position that was appointed by the president). Although Zelensky argued that the change would improve the efficiency of investigations and head off Russian interference, the response from the Ukrainian public was immediate. Thousands took to the streets in defiance of a prohibition against mass gatherings, and the movement quickly became known as the Cardboard Revolution, so named because of the handmade, often profane, and frequently meme-referencing signs carried by the protesters. The Cardboard Revolution exhibited traits typical of the long tradition of Ukrainian political action, but it also fit neatly into the broader Gen Z protest movement. Polls showed that the protesters had widespread support among the Ukrainian public, and Zelensky soon reversed course. On July 31 he signed a law rescinding the earlier legislation and restoring the independence of the anti-corruption organizations.
Zelensky returned to the White House in August, and his reception there was decidedly more welcoming than it had been in February. Trump had signaled an openness to U.S. involvement in postwar security guarantees for Ukraine, and Zelensky altered his wardrobe. He arrived at his meeting with Trump wearing a tailored black field jacket over a black button-down shirt with crisp black slacks; the ensemble was created for Zelensky by Ukrainian fashion designer Viktor Anisimov. Although the meeting did not yield any progress toward a ceasefire agreement with Russia, it did help reset relations between the two leaders and their countries.
In November Zelensky’s chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, resigned after becoming embroiled in a corruption scandal that rocked the Ukrainian government. Although Zelensky was not implicated in wrongdoing, Yermak and several high-ranking members of Zelensky’s cabinet were tied to a $100-million kickback and money laundering scheme involving the state nuclear power company. Yermak had long been perceived as one of the most important members of Zelensky’s inner circle, and the personal association between the two men dated to Zelensky’s Kvartal 95 days.
The chief of staff office remained vacant until January 2026, when Zelensky named Kyrylo Budanov, the head of Ukraine’s military intelligence agency, as Yermak’s successor. Budanov was a somewhat unorthodox spy chief, in that he maintained a fairly prominent media presence, and he was one of the most well-liked public figures in Ukraine. The appointment served several purposes: It signaled a break with Yermak and the political network he had created, it used a popular security official to “clean” an office that had been tainted by scandal, and it allowed Zelensky to keep trusted officials who had not been touched by the corruption investigation in other roles. Indeed, as part of the ensuing cabinet reshuffle, Shmyhal was moved from the defense ministry and named first deputy prime minister and given oversight of the energy portfolio. Significantly, this was the ministry at the center of the corruption scandal, and one of Shmyhal’s first priorities was improving the resilience of the Ukrainian energy grid to Russian missile and drone attacks.









