How does Aristophanes contrast Dicaeopolis and Lamachus at the end of The Acharnians?

In Aristophanes's play Acharnians, the conclusion serves as a stark contrast between the consequences of war and the benefits of peace.

The Athenian commander Lamachus, who represents the rigid and bellicose nature of the Peloponnesian War, is depicted as slumping wounded and dejected after his attempts to obstruct the protagonist's private peace treaty fail. In direct opposition, the farmer-hero Dicaeopolis is shown enjoying the fruits of his personal treaty, indulging in a life of food, wine, and sex.12

Through this juxtaposition, Aristophanes highlights the folly of the conflict, framing the pursuit of peace as a far more desirable and rewarding path than the suffering inherent in military aggression.12