How did Hugo Grotius connect crime and punishment to just war?

Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.

In his seminal work De Jure Belli ac Pacis, Hugo Grotius developed a theory of crime and punishment to provide a framework for regulating international conflict.1

Because there is no supreme judge to settle disputes between independent powers, Grotius argued that war must be tolerated as a necessary means to resolve conflicts. To restrain the violence of these conflicts, he proposed that the resort to war should be limited to specific, just causes—essentially treating war as a form of litigation.1

Within this legalistic framework, Grotius characterized certain wars as a form of "just punishment" for crimes committed by states or other independent powers. By framing military action as a response to wrongdoing, he sought to move beyond mere self-interest and establish a normative basis for war that could be governed by natural law and the law of nations, ultimately aiming to minimize bloodshed.12