Why does a free press support objective dance criticism?
A free press is essential to objective dance criticism because it provides the necessary independence for critics to offer unbiased analysis. When a free press is the norm, critics can function as knowledgeable, impartial observers who increase the public's understanding of choreography and technique.1
In contrast, in environments where a free press does not exist, dance reviews may be compromised by conflicts of interest, such as being written by the choreographer themselves or by professional writers who are financially connected to the performance. By operating outside of these direct influences, a free press ensures that criticism remains a tool for education and insight rather than a vehicle for promotion or bias. This independence allows the critic to fulfill their role as an "ideal spectator"—someone who is attentive, knowledgeable, and capable of delivering clear, incisive evaluations of ephemeral performances.12